Perhaps my grade-four self was already preparing for the academic life, where March in Canada equals not March break but mid-terms, final papers, and the downhill screaming roller coaster ride that takes us to the end of the semester. Or, possibly, I was just showing early signs of being a worry-wart.
March makes big, lovely promises. One step forward into spring. But March is difficult. Two steps back. Today's post is a partial review of the month of March.
Last week ended on a high note. It is no secret that Stephen Harper has been no ally of the women of Canada. Among his administrations most egregious actions is the attempt to silence Sisters in Spirit. Inform yourself, and make the effort to get out and vote.
Mid-month we had a guest post by Shannon Dea that was picked up by jezebel.com and garnered Shannon's post and this site more than 10,000 views in a day. Unfortunately Shannon's post is about the lack of institutional attention given to a hate campaign that is being waged agains the women of U Waterloo.
There've been submissions to This Month In Sexism's email account as well. Here are some of them:
-Recently the University Librarian at McMaster organized an important agenda setting symposium on the "Future of Academic Libraries." Of a possible 21 speakers, in the initial lineup 3 were women - the rest men. Egregious in any context, but particularly insulting given that, according to CAUT statistics, a walloping 73% of Canadian academic librarians are women. Adding insult to injury, librarian bloggers who called out the organizers on the omission were accused of being disingenuous, "rattling the cage" and reverse sexism. You can read blog entries about it here and here (note the comments).
-At a required professional development conference, one of our reader watched a male administrator cut off, completely misunderstand, and then talk over a female instructor who was trying to ask a legitimate question. The morning of the conference thing was devoted to administrators (predominantly male) telling us about their jobs and what they are doing to supposedly help us (but really, it was about how we needed to do better), and then the afternoon was devoted to the (mostly) female instructors (all instructors, not one of us on the tenure-track) talking about what we did in the classroom. Not one administrator stayed for our presentations. Not. One.
On the other hand, Heather has been writing about her experience of applying for promotion on the basis of teaching excellence. Read her posts closely, they offer templates for crucial, positive institutional change.
Further, some readers have found a moment to share some really positive personal accomplishments!
So where does that leave us? Putting one foot in front of the other purposefully, I'd say. Onward with a roar!