G'morning, readers! We have a treat for you today: Emma Morgan-Thorp has written a guest post!
_________________________________
It
seems like February is getting everybody down: technologies are failing, and
everyone’s snowed under by both work and weather. I was feeling tired and grumpy when I arrived at my ‘Indigenous
History’ seminar the other week, and wishing I could burrow under my covers
with a book instead. This seminar, though, is healing: six women around the
table, five first year Masters students and our teacher Paula, talking through
Indigenous ethics and methodologies while we tell stories about our families,
our work, and the places we come from. And on this particular evening we were
graced with a visit by the fabulous Manulani Meyer. As we went around the table
introducing ourselves and our projects to her, Manulani challenged us each to
explain how our work was making change in the world: What is your academic work giving back to the community you are
researching? I was floored – first by the question, and then by the fact
that no one had ever asked me that before.
Lately I’ve been
struggling with whether I ought to be doing academic work at all: entering an
Indigenous Studies department allowed me to sidestep uncomfortable processes of
asking permission to learn from Indigenous elders, activists, and communities.
I still have no idea how I would even go about making such requests. Working from
the sterility of the classroom, no matter how humbly or respectfully, is a far
cry from finding ways to educate myself that don’t rely on my membership in an
exclusionary colonialist institution.
I’ve
been finding myself thinking: I’ll learn about Indigenous Studies – along with
my interlocking projects of feminism, performance theory, and theatre studies –
this year in the MA, and then take my knowledge out into the world and find
ways to work toward substantive change. First theory, then praxis. First I’ll build
myself into an educated activist, and then I’ll act. But Manulani and Paula
challenged us to do intellectual work that is
practical. Academic production that works through ideas and builds strategies
for substantive change.
I am blessed with
revolutionary friends in activist, artistic, care-giving and food-growing
communities who challenge my participation in this academic institution
regularly. When I was home this winter, my mom gave me Jessica Yee Danforth’s Feminism for Real: Deconstructing the Academic Industrial Complex of Feminism and told me how relieved she was
that I had asked for it. A step, we laughed, toward throwing myself off the ‘great
white phallus of the ivory tower’.
What Manulani affirmed
is that intellectual work – in or out of the academy – can be practical
activist work. That it has to be. That there is value in taking time to arm
oneself with the lessons needed to do the best work possible, but that
revolutionary work doesn’t wait while that happens.
During our
mid-seminar break, my friend Erin and I were talking about how lucky we felt to
be in such a warm community of women, talking about making change through peace
and healing. The vulnerability and strength with which we were sharing our
stories and questioning the work we’ve turned our lives toward shook and
stabilized me simultaneously. This is, as Erin said to me, how we decolonize
academia.
I’m still
figuring out how best to work toward change, and certainly still negotiating
the spaces I inhabit within academia and within an Indigenous Studies
department. I’ve been carrying with
me the blissful energy and the ethical challenges that Manulani brought into
our classroom, and as I work through these ideas, I remember what she said to
us: “There is only one conversation happening on the planet: how can we love
better?”
-Emma Morgan-Thorp
I'm sorry to be off-topic, but I get this blog through Google Reader and very regularly all I get is formatting like this:
ReplyDelete0
false
18 pt
18 pt
Not all the time, but enough that I decided to mention it.
Elizabeth -- This bad quirk has to do with cutting and pasting of our blog content from Word or other editors. Blogger is not the most pleasant environment in which to compose text, regrettably, but cutting and pasting from other programs brings a host of garbled formatting code along with it that results in what you're seeing. I try to edit the posts where it's obvious but I don't always see the problem on my browser. Thanks for the heads up!
ReplyDeleteBack on topic, kinda ... the role of education in "revolutionary" change, and the pangs of conscience that go with accommodating oneself to the academy is of course an old problem. In my day, for people like me, the question was why I was sitting in relative comfort reading academic philosophy while many of my friends were dropping out to go and do ... well, whatever ... in Nicaragua after the Sandinista revolution.
ReplyDeleteIt may be purely self-deception, but I think that the longer-term interests of political movements are better served by involving people who have significant education. I think that it's not wrong to want to be an educated activist. I personally worried a lot as my political views evolved whether I was just being co-opted or chickening out, or if I actually was becoming more sophisticated in my thinking. On good days, I hope it was the latter.
I think this is all consistent with Emma's themes: Not all activist learning happens in the classroom. I'd add that it's good to learn from activists who actually accomplish things, not just from those who talk a good game. Making something change means taking into account the interests of people you disagree with when they are going to have some effect on your goals. Talking only to people who view themselves as radicals quickly leads to ineffective tactics, I think. Education broadens your view, and teaches you that the people who disagree with you are generally not evil, even if they're benighted by your lights. At least, this is true for the people you can work with, and you have to find them. And in the academy you learn other things that matter ... it takes people who can talk to the press, to political figures, etc., and be plausible, to make lasting change.