In the wake of a loss, there has to come a period of healing. That healing allows the griever to adjust to the new situation, one in which the object lost exists no more, or not in the same form. A new normal. A new routine. This step is vital, apparently, in order to survive in the face of adversity. But what if adjustment becomes detrimental to survival? What if the best plan would be not to adjust, but to demand, work, and fight for some kind of restitution?
You might have found out that the Department of English and
the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta have been the hardest hit by
the significant budget-reduction step of voluntary severance packages,
initiated in response to the provincial government’s decision to reduce
post-secondary funding by 7.8%.
For an institution whose budget is overwhelmingly dedicated to payroll, that
means laying off people. Many of them.
And so, the loss. English and Film
Studies was one of the most affected by the VSP, in the Faculty of Arts, which
most losses of all at UAlberta so far, because the VSPs don't "save" enough money to make up for the budget shortfall. For now, between 8 and 10 professors and
administrators will leave the department, or around 18%. Almost one fifth of
the people. So you can see that grieving is justified. Is grief, however, the
best way to deal with these attacks on post-secondary education, and especially
on the arts? Do we want to process the pain of the loss, and get used to the
new normal, and move on?
Many post-secondary participants have been tirelessly speaking out against
these cuts, explaining why they do not represent savings, why they are
misguided, problematic, and, ultimately, detrimental to
the province both in the long and in the short term. Some people have taken
path. There is just no
convincing the Alberta government of the long-lasting damage they are
inflicting by barring
access to post-secondary education, while also diminishing its diversity
and range. My friend and colleague Derritt Mason has
clearly outlined the reasons the University of Alberta will lose its
attractiveness to graduate students.
There is another reason I resist the normalizing process.
It acclimatizes us to a culture of paucity that will inevitably lead us to
complete the process of adjunctification of academic labour as we have seen it
happen in the US. While Canadian academics are still buoyed that “the situation
is not as bad here,” these systematic cuts—which have been happening
post-Recession, and have been preceded by the Klein-era ones, etc.—inevitably
lead to hiring cheaper labour to perform the teaching, so that the programs
survive, and the university maintain some semblance of its former self, pace Bill Readings.
What about research funding? The many changes to
Tri-Council policies that have been happening over the past few years also
operate like slowly boiling water around the proverbial frog. The seemingly
seamless integration of technological developments (MOOCs, anyone?) also
maintain the growing temperature of the water to imperceptible levels. This
past weekend’s Globe and Mail hailed a
new development in research: crowdfunding. I may be jumping the gun due to
my research on conspicuous giving, but this ‘revolutionary’ research option
only looks like yet another pot set on the stove.
Panacea are hard to come by, and I do not believe these
cuts will ever be reversed. Yet I still do not want to get used to the new normal,
and I will continue to look for alternatives. In the mean time, I’d be ever so
grateful for your own stories.